President Droupadi Murmu raises concerns over Supreme Court’s stance on governors delaying bill assent, highlighting constitutional implications.mint+4Vajiram & Ravi+4The Financial Express+4www.ndtv.com+1www.ndtv.com+1
In a significant development, President Droupadi Murmu has expressed concerns regarding the Supreme Court’s recent observations on governors delaying assent to state bills. The President emphasized the constitutional implications of such delays, urging a re-examination of the processes involved.www.ndtv.com+1www.ndtv.com+1
The Supreme Court had earlier issued notices to the Centre and the governors of Kerala and West Bengal, seeking explanations for prolonged delays in granting assent to bills passed by the respective state assemblies. The court highlighted that such delays could undermine the federal structure and the legislative authority of elected state governments .www.ndtv.comWikipedia
President Murmu’s intervention underscores the gravity of the issue, as it touches upon the delicate balance between the executive and the judiciary. She pointed out that while the judiciary has the authority to interpret the Constitution, the roles and responsibilities of the President and governors are also constitutionally defined and must be respected.
This development adds a new dimension to the ongoing debate over the autonomy of state legislatures and the role of governors in the legislative process. Legal experts suggest that a clear demarcation of powers and responsibilities is essential to prevent future conflicts and ensure smooth governance.
For more insights into the evolving dynamics between the judiciary and the executive, and their impact on India’s federal structure, stay tuned to our Constitutional Affairs section.
